Lodi Finance Committee - June 10, 2026

Lodi Finance Committee Special Meeting - June 10, 2026 (LodiEye Summary)

Summary

The Lodi Finance Committee meets in special session on June 10, 2026 to take up a single substantive item: a comprehensive redline overhaul of the City's Purchasing Policy, last revised May 20, 2022. The new June 4, 2026 draft raises the City Manager's signature authority to $80,000 plus an annual CPI escalator, creates a new 5% local vendor preference (capped at $50,000), lifts public-works and vehicle thresholds, strengthens documentation rules, and adds a new federal-grant procurement section to comply with 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance). The Committee will also approve the April 15, 2026 minutes.

Agenda at a Glance

  • A. Call to Order / Roll Call
  • B.1 Approve Minutes — April 15, 2026 (Special Meeting)
  • B.2 Discussion and Review of Purchasing Policy Redline Revisions (core item)
  • C. Adjournment

Public Comment

Public comment may be submitted in person, by email to jbandy@lodi.gov, by mail (City Manager's Office, P.O. Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241), or hand-delivered to 221 W. Pine Street. Email, mail, and hand-delivered comments must be received no later than two hours before the meeting, and will be entered into the official record but not read aloud. The agenda was signed by Treasurer Jamie Bandy and posted at least 24 hours in advance per Government Code §54954.2(a).

Core Item: Purchasing Policy Redline Revisions

Staff (prepared by Administrative Services Director Jamie Bandy) identified the need to update the policy to improve clarity, strengthen internal controls, incorporate municipal code requirements, add a local purchasing preference, and ensure compliance with federal procurement standards under 2 CFR Part 200. The item maps to Strategic Vision goal 3A. Fiscal Health: Promote City's transparency & fiscal fluency, with no fiscal impact.

The Nine Proposed Revisions

#RevisionDetail
1Local Vendor Preference (p.4)New 5% preference, capped at $50,000, for qualifying local vendors when permitted by law
2Purchasing Officer Role (p.2)Formally recognizes the City Manager-appointed Purchasing Officer, aligning policy with Municipal Code
3Public Works Thresholds (p.3-4)≤$75,000: PO, no bids; $75,000-$220,000: informal bidding; >$220,000: formal bidding
4Vehicle Purchase Threshold (p.3)Purchases >$100,000 require Council approval (raised from $50,000)
5Strengthened Documentation (p.5)Must identify vendors who declined or did not respond to solicitations
6Blanket/Open Purchase Orders (p.6)Adds governing language for recurring as-needed goods and services
7Informal/Unsealed Quotes (p.8)Details procedures for purchases under $80,000
8Renewals Over $80,000 (p.14 & 18)Strengthens language requiring such renewals to go to Council
9City Manager Authority (p.1)Sets authority at $80,000 plus annual CPI increases, per the April decision

Threshold Changes: Old vs. New

ItemOldNew (Draft)
City Manager contract authority$60,000$80,000 + CPI
Informal vs. formal procedure cutoff$60,000$80,000
Vehicle purchases requiring Council$50,000$100,000
Public Works: PO / no bids≤$60,000≤$75,000
Public Works: informal bidding ceiling$200,000$220,000
Change orders / renewals to Council$60,000$80,000

Local Vendor Preference Details

The most significant new addition. Staff surveyed comparable agencies — the Cities of Elk Grove, Chico, and Concord, and the Counties of San Joaquin and Sonoma — and found a 5% preference is the most common approach. To qualify, a "Local Vendor" must:

  • Maintain a physical business location within Lodi city limits;
  • Hold a valid City business license;
  • Comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws; and
  • Have operated continuously in the City for at least one year before the solicitation date.

The preference is for evaluation purposes only — it does not raise the contract amount paid and does not require awarding to a local vendor over a better-value bidder. It does not apply when prohibited by state/federal law or grant conditions, when there is no responsive local vendor, or for cooperative, state, or piggyback contracts.

CPI Inflation-Adjustment Mechanism

The City Manager's authority is set at $80,000 at policy commencement, and all purchasing thresholds adjust each July 1 by the percentage change in the CPI-U for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). Adjustments round to the nearest $100, are calculated and published annually by the Purchasing Officer, and a CPI decrease can never reduce an existing threshold.

New Section IV: Federal Grant Purchases (Uniform Guidance)

An entirely new section was added to comply with 2 CFR 200.318-200.326 for procurements using federal grant funds. Highlights:

  • Conflict-of-interest rules barring employees/agents (and their families or partners) from participating where they have a financial interest, plus a prohibition on accepting gratuities.
  • A prohibition on local geographic preferences for federally funded procurements (except A/E services), which overrides the new local vendor preference for grant work.
  • Required procurement methods: sealed bids (preferred for construction), competitive proposals, and noncompetitive/sole-source only under specific conditions.
  • Affirmative steps to use minority-owned and women's business enterprises.
  • A cost or price analysis for every action above the $150,000 Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and a ban on "cost plus a percentage of cost" contracting.
  • Bonding (5% bid guarantee; 100% performance and payment bonds) and required clauses: Equal Employment Opportunity, Davis-Bacon, Copeland Anti-Kickback, Contract Work Hours, Clean Air Act, Debarment/Suspension, and the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment.

Background: April 15, 2026 Meeting (B.1 Minutes)

The June meeting continues a discussion begun in April. That special meeting was called to order at 1:33 p.m. with Vice Chair Yepez and Member Woehl present and Chair Hothi absent.

  • City Manager signature authority — The Committee voted to raise authority from $60,000 to $80,000 plus CPI, rounded to the nearest $100; Woehl had recommended an $80K-$90K range.
  • Accepting donations — Vice Chair Yepez preferred that all monetary donations continue to require Council approval; in-kind donations are handled separately since no City funds are appropriated.
  • FCM Audit update — Accounting Manager Lor reported the audit reports would go to Council on May 6 or May 20, with findings consistent with the prior year.
  • The meeting adjourned at 2:26 p.m.

Attachments

  • Attachment 1 — Special Meeting Minutes, April 15, 2026
  • Draft Purchasing Policy (Council Adoption Aug. 19, 2020; Revised May 20, 2022; Draft June 4, 2026) with redline revisions

References

  • Source document: Finance Committee Special Meeting Agenda and Materials (City of Lodi, June 10, 2026)
  • City of Lodi — Official Website
  • Treasurer / Administrative Services Director: Jamie Bandy — jbandy@lodi.gov
  • Meeting location: Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240

Rendered Attachments

The full text of both agenda attachments is reproduced below as HTML. Redline edits from the June 4, 2026 draft are shown with struck-through deletions and highlighted additions.

Attachment 1 — Special Meeting Minutes, April 15, 2026
Finance Committee Special Meeting · Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi · Wednesday, April 15, 2026 – 1:30 p.m. · Prepared by Monica Calderon, Administrative Assistant-Confidential

A. Call to Order

The Special Finance Committee Meeting of April 15, 2026, was called to order at 1:33 p.m.

  • Present: Vice Chair Yepez and Committee Member Woehl
  • Absent: Chair Hothi
  • Also Present: Interim City Manager Busch, Treasurer Jaromay, Budget Manager Baker-Bechthold, Accounting Manager Lor, Budget Analyst Howell, and Administrative Assistant Calderon

B. Regular Calendar

B.1 Approve Meeting Minutes — March 11, 2026

VOTE: Motion by Chair Yepez, second by Member Woehl, carried.
Ayes: Vice Chair Yepez and Member Woehl · Noes: None · Absent: Chair Hothi

B.2 Purchasing Draft Policy

Budget Manager Baker-Bechthold reviewed the Purchasing Policy, municipal code, and current purchasing organizational structure, noting that the City Manager is responsible for designating the Purchasing Officer. Discussion included the estimated cost of existing purchasing oversight practices, audit timelines, and the potential use of external auditors to monitor procurement activity.

Feedback was provided on policy updates, including purchasing thresholds and vehicle purchasing limits, with further discussion planned at a future meeting when all Committee Members are present. Recommendations included strengthening documentation and policy language. Staff will provide a printout of all vehicles purchased for the next meeting.

B.3 City Manager Purchasing Policy Authority

Budget Manager Baker-Bechthold reviewed the current signature authority limits for the City Manager, including the potential adjustment of the signing threshold to expedite procurement of time-sensitive equipment. The discussion included a proposal to increase the City Manager's signature authority threshold. Quarterly reports to the City Council will continue. The Committee discussed proposed threshold amounts, with Woehl recommending a range of $80K–$90K.

Motion: Approve City Manager's purchasing authority from $60,000 to $80,000 plus CPI, rounded to the nearest $100.
VOTE: Motion by Chair Yepez, second by Member Woehl, carried.
Ayes: Vice Chair Yepez and Member Woehl · Noes: None · Absent: Chair Hothi

B.4 Accepting Donations

Budget Manager Baker-Bechthold reviewed the process for accepting donations and appropriating related funds. It was noted that the City Council retains authority over monetary donations, with discussion including a proposed threshold for the City Manager's discretion in distributing certain monetary contributions.

Vice Chair Yepez expressed a preference that all donation amounts continue to require City Council approval. It was discussed that larger monetary donations may be placed into a trust as applicable. Physical donations are handled separately from monetary contributions because no City funds are required to be formally accepted or appropriated by Council. Donated goods are not subject to the City's standard budgetary and purchasing compliance controls.

Non-Agenda Item

Accounting Manager Lor provided an update on the FCM Audit Reports, which are anticipated to be presented at either the May 6 or May 20 City Council meeting. The findings are consistent with those of last year's audit. The draft report will be submitted directly to the City Council.

C. Adjournment

Vice Chair Yepez adjourned the meeting at 2:26 p.m. Attest: Jamie Bandy, Treasurer.

Attachment 2 — Draft Purchasing Policy (Redline)
City of Lodi Purchasing Policy · Council Adoption: Aug. 19, 2020 · Revised: May 20, 2022 · Draft: June 4, 2026
Section I · General (p.1)

Purpose. To establish the manner by which all City procurement is to be conducted and to ensure City compliance with applicable laws relating to the expenditure of public funds.

Policy. All City employees shall follow this policy to correctly and ethically process a procurement need and ensure the efficient use of public funds. All City rules, regulations, laws, resolutions and the City Purchasing Ordinance are incorporated herein. See Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 2.12 (City Manager) and Chapter 3.20 (Purchasing System), and the procurement standards in 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326.

Overview. Purchasing functions are decentralized, with each Department/Division responsible for compliance. The City Manager's purchasing authority will be set at $80,000 at the commencement of this policy. The City Manager's purchasing authority and all other purchasing thresholds shall be adjusted annually to account for inflation. Beginning July 1 following adoption, and each July 1 thereafter, applicable thresholds shall be increased by the percentage change in the CPI-U, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area, as published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, using the most recently available calendar year data. The adjusted threshold shall be rounded to the nearest $100. The Purchasing Officer shall calculate and publish the revised amounts annually. In no event shall a CPI decrease reduce an existing threshold. The City Manager is authorized to execute contracts in the amount of $60,000 or less. The City Manager may delegate purchasing authority to qualified staff (3.20.060).

Section I (p.2)

There is established the position of Purchasing Officer. The Purchasing Officer shall be appointed by the City Manager and shall have general oversight of the purchasing functions of the City. The duties may be combined with those of any other office or position (3.20.020–3.20.030).

Key rules for all purchases: no purchase undertaken without an established appropriation; departments maintain budget control; certain unique purchases are excluded from competitive bidding (state/county services, debt service, utilities). The City Manager may execute contracts of $80,000 $60,000 or less; Department Directors up to $30,000 (2.12.060). Electronic hardware/software over $60,000 requires Council approval (LMC 3.20.077).

Section I (p.3)

Public Works projects (PCC §22000, Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act), per §22032:

  • Projects of $75,000 $60,000 or less may be let by Purchase Order or negotiated contract (no bids required).
  • Projects between $75,000 and $220,000 $60,000 and $200,000 may be let by informal bidding (PCC 22034).
  • Projects more than $220,000 $200,000 are let by formal bidding procedures.

Procurement involving state/federal grant funds shall comply with such laws (LMC 3.20.095 and Section IV). Ethics rules bar employee financial interest, misuse of procedures, and bid-rigging. Bid/RFP/RFQ records are kept per Local Government Records Management Guidelines (successful up to seven years; unsuccessful up to three years). The City Manager may make minor (administrative) changes without Council approval; substantive changes require Council authorization.

Section I · Solicitation Thresholds (p.3–4)
  • Purchases less than $10,000 — no solicitation required (verbal bids acceptable).
  • Purchases between $10,000 and $80,000 $60,000 — three written bids or proposals; advertisement not required.
  • Purchases greater than $80,000 $60,000 — formal sealed bids; advertisement required.
  • Vehicle purchases greater than $100,000 $50,000 — require Council approval prior to soliciting/awarding bids.

Local Vendor Preference. A "Local Vendor" maintains a physical business location within City limits, holds a valid City business license, complies with all applicable laws, and has operated continuously in the City for at least one year before the solicitation date. The City may apply a preference of up to 5% of the lowest responsive non-local bid, not to exceed $50,000, for evaluation purposes only (never increasing the contract amount paid).

Section I (p.5)

The preference does not apply when prohibited by federal/state law, grant or funding conditions; when no responsive local vendor exists; for cooperative/state/piggyback contracts; or when the Purchasing Officer determines it contrary to the City's best interests. Nothing requires award to a Local Vendor when another vendor provides the best value.

Issuing the Quote/Bid/RFP/RFQ. Solicitations over $10,000 require competitive quotes; staff make reasonable attempts to obtain at least three written quotes and are encouraged to use the City's online bidding system. If unable to receive three written bids, the list of vendors solicited who declined or were unresponsive should be included in the record. Award goes to the lowest responsible bidder.

Exceptions to bidding: emergencies (Emergency Justification Form; agenda report to Council if over $30,000); sole-source commodities; specified professional services; and cooperatively bid governmental contracts (State, DGS, WSCA, Sourcewell, OMNIA, NJPA).

Section I (p.6–8)

Purchases over $80,000 under sole-source/professional-services/cooperative exceptions must be authorized by Council. Procurement/Payment Methods: the Purchase Order is the preferred method of encumbering materials over $10,000 and one-time services, processed in MUNIS. Blanket/open purchase orders may be used for recurring as-needed goods and services and follow the same competitive thresholds and renewal provisions as other methods. A three-way match (requisition/PO → receipt → invoice) is required. Other methods include Professional Services Agreements, the CAL-Card procurement card (typically up to $10,000), and Wire/EFT for time-sensitive large-dollar transactions.

Section II · Supplies, Materials & Equipment (p.9–12)

Material/supply purchases exceeding $80,000 $60,000 must be awarded by Council. Departments make every reasonable attempt to obtain three quotes for purchases between $10,000 and $80,000, documenting steps taken when three are not received. Informal procedures cover open-market purchases up to the City Manager's authority; public-works informal bidding follows LMC 3.20.105. Formal/sealed bids (LMC 3.20.100) require a bid package, public notice, sealed bid opening before witnesses, and award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Change orders up to $80,000 $60,000 aggregate may be approved by the City Manager; those exceeding $80,000 $60,000 go to Council.

Section III · Professional Services (p.13–19)

Professional service contracts exceeding $80,000 $60,000 must be awarded by resolution of the City Council; informal RFP/RFQ is used below that threshold. Selection is qualifications-based (quality, organization, personnel, references, capacity), with price secondary. Contract routing requires a PSA approved by the City Attorney, IRS Form W-9, proof of insurance, and a business license where applicable. Renewals: ongoing-service contracts may renew for up to four additional years, but any exceeding $80,000 $60,000 overall must be Council-approved; maintenance/software agreements go to Council at or above $80,000.

Section IV · Purchases with Federal Grant Funds (p.20–26)

This new section establishes standards required by 2 CFR 200.318–200.326 (Uniform Guidance). Highlights:

  • Conflict of interest (200.318(c)): no employee, officer, or agent may participate where they, an immediate family member, or partner has a financial interest; no gratuities may be accepted.
  • Restricting competition (200.319): prohibits unreasonable qualification requirements, excessive bonding, brand-name-only specs, and local geographic preferences (except A/E services).
  • Methods (200.320): sealed bids (preferred for construction), competitive proposals, and noncompetitive/sole-source only under specific conditions.
  • MBE/WBE (200.321): affirmative steps to use minority-owned and women's business enterprises.
  • Cost & price (200.323): cost/price analysis for every action above the $150,000 Simplified Acquisition Threshold; ban on "cost plus a percentage of cost."
  • Bonding (200.325): 5% bid guarantee, 100% performance bond, and 100% payment bond for construction contracts above the threshold.
  • Required contract provisions (Appendix II): Remedies (>$150K), Termination (>$30K), Equal Employment Opportunity, Davis-Bacon Act, Copeland Anti-Kickback, Contract Work Hours & Safety Standards (>$100K), Rights to Inventions, Clean Air Act & Clean Water Act (>$150K), Debarment & Suspension (SAM.gov verification), and the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (>$100K).
Next
Next

The Squeezed Consumer: 12 Months of Household Financial Stress in San Joaquin County